All Self-Serve Demos / Public demo case

DEMONSTRATION — real engine output, snapshot of 2026-09-03, resident and owner identifiers redacted. This page renders a static snapshot exported from a real rent-reasonableness run, not a live database read — nothing here updates. The engine that produced it has since been found to have a pending SEV-1 comparable-deduplication defect (details below); a corrected re-run may change this determination.

Case DEMO-0001 — 504 E Valencia Ave, Unit A/B, Burbank, CA

Housing Authority of the City of Burbank (CA105) · snapshot date 2026-09-03 · run date 2026-09-04 · determination ledger RRPRO-2026-000074

Determination summary — one row per unit

UnitProposed rentFMR90–110% bandAdj. comp medianCompsDetermination
1 Bedroom$2,095$2,670$2,403 – $2,937$1,97411 ✕ IS NOT reasonable
$1,974 /mo — adjusted comp median (24 CFR 982.507)

Owner requested $2,095 (the one reviewer-entered figure in this case, disclosed as such — an RFTA figure with no underlying RFTA in production). FY2026 FMR $2,670. Payment-standard band (90–110% FMR) $2,403–$2,937. Confidence 98% over 11 comparables. Regulatory basis: 24 CFR 982.507.

Comparability profile — all nine factors under 24 CFR 982.507(b)

Four of nine factors are honestly marked “reviewer to assess” or “per lease / no market comp value” rather than defaulted to a guess — the product discloses which factors it could not evidence instead of inventing them.

Comparability exhibit — comps, adjustments, sources

#ComparableScoreSizeBuiltAdvertisedAdjustmentsAdjustedData-backedSource

Correspondence — delivery evidence row

Ledger identifiers produced by this case

    Deliverables generated for this case: HUD-52517, the RentSpire determination record, the comparability exhibit, and a pilot one-click handoff packet assembling all three. Every card cites its ledger id rather than trusting the PDF alone.